Weblog

Sunday, 01 February 2009

  • Why I am not a Christian


    I was a Christian for four years in total. My passion for God and learning everything I could about him was what lead me to dive into Bible study with an enthusiasm that most people lack. I was a Jesus nerd and that was my undoing. I was learning because I wanted to know, not because I had something to prove. This can be a dangerous combination. This entry is a list of the things I personally cannot accept about Christianity. They won't be a problem for everybody and there are things some people have problems with that I won't list because they don't affect my belief. This is not an attempt to convert anybody by merely an organizing of my thoughts.

     

    If, as a result of reading this entry, you fear for the fate of my soul, please do not hesitate to attempt to refute some or all of my arguments. Even the usual tactic of ignoring my arguments entirely and posting some copypasta about Jesus dying for me is appreciated. If you think I'm on a one way track to Hell and you do nothing about it, I will be personally offended.

     

    1. There are errors in the Bible. If the Bible is the absolute, inerrant word of God then it must always be true. Even one error in the book makes it the imperfect word of man. (Gen 32:30 vs John 1:18 , 2 Kings 8:26 vs 2 Chronicles 22:2, 2 Samuel 6:23 vs 2 Samuel 21:8, 2 Samuel 8:3-4 vs 1 Chronicles 18:3-4, 1 Kings 4:26 vs 2 Chronicles 9:25, 2 Kings 25:8 vs Jeremiah 52:12, Matt 1:16 vs Luke 3:23, James 1:13 vs Gen 22:1, Lev 11:6 & Deut 14:7 hare do not chew the cud or divide the hoof, Luke 2:1-2 There would be no reason for people to go to their home towns for a census) These are just a couple of factual errors and contradictions. There are many many more. This is not a back breaker on its own but it is part of a mountain of evidence.

    2. The Bible, when read from beginning to end (with a basic understanding of European history), shows either a bipolar God who lacks foresight or the spiritual development of a people as they alter their God to suit their need. I've divided the Bible into five ages:

      1. The age of legend: this is pretty much everything that happened before Moses. The world is full of magic, angels rape women and blow up cities, God tells a guy to kill his son as a test, whole planets are flooded, women turn into salt and then show up again later, animals talk, giants walk the land and stick waving is a legitimate way of determining a sheep's colouring. This is the time before the written word, when stories were told to little Hebrew children around the campfire and anything that could be made bigger was made huge.

      2. The age of Nomads: God calls his people out of slavery and into the desert. This is a young God with a chip on his shoulder because he went away for a few hundred years and people had forgotten about him. He needs to make a really big splash. He hardens Pharaoh's heart so he can show off his wrath with bugs, boils and death. Parts the sea. Historically there would be little to gain by parting the red sea which would've been well out of the way so he probably actually parted the reed sea (the Hebrew word is the same) which is in the Nile Delta next to a large abandoned Hebrew settlement and prone to sudden drying and flooding. He had his people march around in the dessert and gave them a bunch of rules for nomadic living. Death was the main punishment because dungeons don't work when you are nomadic.

      3. The age of Kings: after 40 years of walking in circles, carving stone tablets and genital mutilation, the Hebrews follow the Ten Commandments (Exodus 32) and commit mass genocide in the homeland of their ancestors. They now have a place to settle down. Unfortunately, the laws that are valid for a nomadic tribe don't work anymore but because the law is from God, they can't ever take anything away, they can add to it though. So they add refuge cities and a few new property laws and traditions.

      4. The Age of occupation: Israel is invaded by everybody. The Persians tweek God a little and make him good and loving. They introduce the concept of Heaven and Hell, and of the Holy Spirit and Satan (Satan features once in the Bible before this in the book of Job, which is actually a Sumerian story which predates the rest of the Bible). God doesn't want sacrifices anymore. The Hebrews get sent all over the place and end up being part of Rome. They are slaves in their own land and they can't obey their laws the way they want to and they keep waiting for another judge to come and set them free. Numerous messiahs rise and most are crucified, their followers scatter and then rally behind the next would be messiah. Jesus comes along and rather than free his people, gives them some new ways of interpreting the laws so that they can live in slavery better. The main thing that sets him apart from other messiahs is that he doesn't stay dead when he is crucified, but instead his corpse is animated briefly by God who speaks to a few people and then flies away before the body begins to rot.

      5. The story is now about non-Hebrews following the myth of a Hebrew man-god who taught Persian ideals in a Hebrew context. The main character is a Hebrew scholar who sees an apparition, repackages Jesus' teachings to suit a wider audience and sells it as the new Mithra. People eat it up, there is a time of miracles and all the evangelists are executed one by one expecting Jesus to come back any day now. Finish of with a book of rehashed prophecies from the Old Testament, the Apocrypha and one doctored Mithra story because the prophet go confused.

    3. God is either worthy of worship. Or he is not. If the God of the Bible is not made up but is in fact bipolar, then this is a scary world indeed. As early as the Garden of Eden we see God set up two people for failure. He gives them a choice and then punishes the whole world because they guessed wrong. If he said they would die and they didn't know what death was, then he was an irresponsible God and their failure is his fault. Think I'm in the wrong for judging God? Read the passage. The tree is called the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. If God is purely good, then only Man, who has eaten from the tree knows both good and evil, as such, only man stands in a position to judge fairly what actions are good and evil.

      It is the potter who makes the pots and he makes them for noble and ignoble purposes. Can a pot say to a potter why have you made me like this? Continuing the analogy, if a potter makes a chamber pot and gives in an acute sense of smell, then that potter is deliberately causing unnecessary suffering for the sake of his own glory and is thus a wicked potter who is unworthy of worship. And even the cooking pots should revile him even at the risk of being smashed for standing up against the tyrant.

      If the God of the Bible who endorses slavery (Luke 12:42-48), rape (Deut 22:28-29), tells his people to kill their children (Deut 21:20-21) kills 42 children for calling a prophet “baldy” (2 kings 2:23-24) and so on. I would be here all night if I had to list every atrocity carried out at the bequest of God in the Bible alone. Anybody who says the crusades were people misreading the Bible Have. Not. Read. Their. Bible.

    4. Jesus apparently fulfills over 300 Old testament prophecies. That is very impressive until you start actually looking up these prophecies in the Old testament to see them in context. For example, Matthew 2:15 Jesus was taken to Egypt to fulfill the prophecy “Out of Egypt I called me son.” This quotes a passage from Hosea 11:1, let us read: “When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son. But the more I called Israel, the further they went from me. They sacrificed to the Baals and they burned incense to images. It was I who taught Ephraim to walk, taking them by the arms; but they did not realize it was I who healed them.” This is not the fulfillment of prophecy, this is a deceitful linguistic trick.

    5. But what about the miracles? Many gods produce miracles. I'd passed being impressed by magic tricks before I became a Christian. I was a Demonologist before I was a Christian, I pulled healing and emotion transference tricks that would make a Reiki master proud. All the miracles I performed as a Christian were pretty much just a reworking of the demon powers I used before being used to heal rather than harm. Christian magic really isn't any more powerful than anybody else's magic. It all follows the same basic rules.

    6. Just have faith: No. Blind faith is not worship, it is laziness. If God does exist, I want to worship him in Spirit and Truth, not some religion I picked because all my friends were doing it and it was easier than actually looking for the answers.

    7. Pray and see what God says: No. God is not my imagination. He is not my subconscious. He does not speak to my thoughts and he doesn't communicate to me in dreams. If God decides to communicate with me, it will be through a reliable and testable medium.

     

    Well, that's my main reasons. There are more but those are the main ones. If somebody can provide adequate responses to these five arguments to convince me, then I would quite happily give Christianity another chance. Otherwise, I'm moving on for greener pastures.

Saturday, 31 January 2009

  • Problems with Evolution

    This post is specifically about refuting Darwinist evolution theory and the theories branching from it. This post is about evolution theory and not about any competing theories. If evolution is proved false, that does not make any other theory true by default. Each case must stand on its own merit and not on the weakness of its competitors. This is not an academic paper and does not include citations. If you want to find my sources, a quick google search of key terms will give you everything you need to hear the full scientific breakdown of the arguements by people a lot smarter than I. While many people lump big bang cosmology and old earth theory in with Evolution, I do not. The evidence against each of those is enough to warrant their own lists. I am open to any counter arguements to these points and look forward to reading any that may be offered. So, without further ado, here are eight arguments against evolution:

     

    1. Problem of origin. The idea that simple life forms evolved from amino acids under the right circumstances seems reasonable at first, but where are these simple life forms now? Single celled organisms are actually incredibly complex. The DNA structure of amoeba is similarly complex to that of humans. Protein cannot form complex systems without DNA.

    2. No intermediate fossil evidence. If evolution is true, there should be a huge collection of fossils from every link in the chain. What we find however, is the same familiar skeletons of finished creatures and no intermediate forms. If Evolution occurs slowly, over millions of years then every fossil we find should be a step between two forms and the transitional forms should outnumber the recognizable forms by a huge margin.

    3. Irreducible complexity in micro organisms. The obvious example is the bacterial flagellum. It is a complex biological, electromagnetic, water cooled, rotary engine which would not function without all the pieces. Anything less than the completed specimen is a useless addition and would've been a waste of resources. In Evolutionary terms, unless the motor appeared in its completed state with all 40 moving parts, natural selection simply cannot preserve it. Even with all the parts, the construction process is a complex set of information, the equivilant of thousands of pages of code, all of which has to come into place symultaniously to be of any practical benefit to the organism.

    4. Junk DNA. As a creature that has ancestry of amoeba, fish, reptiles and apes , humans should have vast amounts of junk DNA with functions that have simply been turned off since we don't need scales or gills anymore. Medical science however, has mapped the functions for most of human DNA, there doesn't appear to be anything that doesn't do something.

    5. Protein shapes. Proteins are essentially the building blocks for all cells. If it all came from amino acids, then the different protein shapes would have to either develop individually or mutate from a base protein. For a protein to change shape it would need to be altered by 70%, while a change of 0.1% is enough to make it useless in forming the machines that make up even the most basic functions of cells. In a protein with 1000 variables, 700 would have to change in precisely the right way and even one error would result in that protein either failing to fold or sticking to other proteins and probably killing the organism. All that is before evolution gets a chance to decide if the change is a good one. Minor changes are simply not possible on this level.

    6. Non-functional intermediates. In evolution, every minor change must significantly improve the survivability of the mutant over the rest of the species. In terms of finches with long, sharp beaks this works. A slightly sharper beak means the finch can crack through a see that another finch cannot. The case for a mouse growing long webbed fingers and eventually turning into a bat is tougher to make. For one thing, if inch long fingers were a significant advantage for mice in any way, we'd see a lot more long fingered mice (unless they evolved the desire for flight before they evolved the long, webbed fingers and the longer their fingers were, the less likely they were to die when jumping off a cliff... even in this case, we would expect to find a large pile of long fingered, suicidal mouse fossils at the bottom of a cliff somewhere).

    7. Methodological naturalism. The presumption that if you are going to approach a problem scientifically then you must automatically disregard any explanation of supernatural means. This is an ideologically loaded approach to science. While I can see the merits of the concept, I'm beginning to wonder if, in light of mounting evidence, this approach needs to be reevaluated.

    8. God of the gaps. This is an accusation that Atheists frequently level at Monotheists. The idea that every time the current idea of God is proven to be false, the definition changes. God moves from living on a mountain to the clouds and causing thunder when he is angry, then into space and finally into alternate dimensions, always living in the gaps of real understanding until such time as all the gaps are filled and God goes away forever. I would like to point out that Evolutionists who say things like “evolution is a fact” have stepped out of the realms of science and into faith. Evolution is a theory and an incomplete theory at that. Each time part of the theory is disproved, the theory changes and shifts around the evidence and then stands up again as “indisputable fact”. Origin remains unexplained but the theory has been redefined so as to have never included the original cell so every argument against evolution regarding origin is declared invalid. Evolution theory has changed through a process of natural selection to include large, complex mutations rather than exclusively small, simple mutations after the latter proved inadequate.

     

    At this stage, evolution has failed to present enough evidence to claim a status of unquestionable truth. While there is plenty of evidence to support natural selection there is very little that supports macro evolution; and of the evidence which is available, most can be interpreted other ways or ruled out entirely as hoaxes. As it currently stands, the strongest argument for evolution is blind, dogmatic faith. Evolution is a religion.

Tuesday, 14 October 2008

  • Zombie Jesus

    http://kris-wilson.deviantart.com/art/Ea
    ster-3-80836346 is the original location of this conversation. I enjoyed it so much I thought I'd share.

    cacai230
    : I am saddened that you blaspheme the saviour. 

    Meioma: lol awsome! Jesus is my fav fairy tale character!^^

    cacai230: Un, no to be rude, but Jesus is not a fairy tale character, he is real.

    jamindavey: Well Zombie Jesus is real to me and I find your blasphemy comments offensive. Take them back now.

    cacai230: no, because jesus is not a zombie, he is alive and well

    jamindavey: Perhaps by YOUR beliefs a man god can suffer a few hours on a cross and spend a few days in the grave to pay for the eternity of death and suffering owed to mankind but in MY view, Jesus must suffer eternally as a zombie in order to pay the cost of eternal damnation. IF you read your Bible you will see that the mortal wounds which caused Jesus to die were never healed when he was raised. Thomas even stuck his hand in them. Therefore, with unhealed, mortal wounds, the risen Lord MUST be a zombie.

    cacai230: so, if jesus suffers eternally as a zombie, then where is that zombie now? huh?

    jamindavey: He hangs out with with Lazarus and all the other zombies raised at the same time (see Matthew 27:51-53), as since the Bible clearly states that you can only die once (see Hebrews 9:27) they're not going anywhere until judgement day.

    cacai230: well then where are the other zombie? huh

    jamindavey: Walking around among us.

    cacai230: no, no, no, he is in heaven and seated on the right hand of the father almighty from where he will judge the living and the dead

    jamindavey: So you do believe in Zombie Jesus?

    cacai230: no, because he is alive in heaven

    jamindavey: Are his mortal wounds healed now or are they, as the bible describes?

    cacai230: its is as the bible describes nut thats is to show that he is really risen from the dead

    jamindavey: If he still has unhealed, mortal wounds which did in fact kill him and yet walks, breathes, talks and eats then he is an animated corpse. If, when the centurian jabbed him in the side, the 'water' that came out was limph, proving the his heart had stopped, and the state of no heartbeat was not healed then his body is dead. Since there is still a hole in his side there is no reason to believe that his heart has been reactivated as this would have the effect of a perpetual jushing fountain of blood spilling from his side, hands and feet; a detail gross enough to be included in the Bible. If there in no heartbeat and no bloodflow, his body is technically dead. Even if it has been preserved and avoiding decomposition over all these years by being posessed by a spirit, it is definitely a dead thing.

    Coincidentally, since touching a dead thing would make the spirit unclean, it is impossible that the posessing spirit could be considered holy.

    zxJayColdxz: I worship you.

    I haven't heard back from cacai for seven days so I guess the discussion is over. Shame that. I had a whole speech prepared about symbolically feasting upon the blood and bones of a dead man. Okay, it is a hollow victory of intellect to win a debate over somebody who ends half their posts with "huh?" but I laughed, and that is what counts. All hail zombie jesus!

Friday, 30 November 2007

  • My Ideal Self


    As part of my how-can-I-take-a-good-thing-and-make-it-better quest, I am taking PyBlog's advice on simple ways to make myself happier by creating new thinking habits.  I will link the article below. The first suggestion is to visualise your best possible self. I'd also like to encourage anyone reading this who would like to be happier than they currently are to check out the article and to write some similar posts. It'll help me with step two which is 'helping others' as well as making you happy. Do it.

    http://www.spring.org.uk/2007/11/3-happiness-enhancing-activities-with.php


    Thinking of my best future self, there are a few areas of importance to me that I would like to succeed in. Health is an obvious one which I am already taking active steps towards. Friendship is an area where I am already incredibly satisfied with but I'm happy to expand on a good thing. Romance/Romantic Relationships is another important issue for me, as is career/finance, and family. Spirituality tends to make its way onto this kind of list more often than not but I'm going to approach it from a different view and divide the reality of spirituality into emotional health, perception of meaning and attitude toward life. For the purpose of this entry, I'm going to set my benchmark at approximately ten years from now. This gives me time to dream big yet still be realistic about what is actually possible

    I've been working on my physical fitness for awhile already: building muscle, increasing stamina, eating... food. As a 36 year old, I see myself having achieved my current fitness goals long ago. I never wanted to be a meat head so I'd say I weigh around 80-85kgs and am relatively lean. I've got a sixpack too. Sixpacks never go out of style. I go swimming and jogging on a regular basis. I lead an active lifestyle. I've got more than enough energy to play with my hypothetical kids for hours and hours. And my wife and I... I'll get to that in a few paragraphs. Health wise I've taken to healthy eating so I don't often get sick and on the rare occasions that I do, my hefty immune system can take down most viruses in no time flat. I'm looking forward to a long and healthy life.

    In friendship, I have a diverse group of close friends. We have vastly different backgrounds and lifestyles, yet we still find time to meet up for a game of D&D or to have a few drinks around the barbie on most weekends. We support each other and use our influence in our various areas to give each other a bit of a leg up when needed. LU and A are two friends I'd definitely like to keep, even after we move out of each other's proximity. This rest of our D&D group too really. I think we really do have the potential to be an awesome, tight nit group of friends in a few years. My best possible future has all of them still in my life on a regular basis. Really, I love you guys.

    Romance is wonderful. My best possible self in ten years is married to a stunningly attractive, intelligent and feisty redhead who challenges me every day to be a better person, to push myself to new levels. She loves me and I love her. Five years into our marriage (we had the ceremony on the beach) we still make our mutual friends sick with our playful flirting which appears to have no end. We enjoy a rather experimental sex life (utilising the awesome fitness we both share) and encourage our kids to visit their friends and grandparents regularly. We've been together long enough now that the initial chemical excitement has waned and given way to a stronger and more stable contentment and comfort with have with each other.

    I've now become a recognised and moderately famous author. Enough that I can sustain a comfortable lifestyle for myself and my family. I churn out a couple of books a year which keeps us in beer and biskets and allows me to work from home. I've developed a loyal fan base and I occasionally procrastinate by going and chatting with them on the official fan forums, giving advice to young authors who are just starting out in the field. I have invested wisely and now have a very healthy stock portfolio. I don't really have to think much about money anymore.

    I'm still in touch with my parents and my large house has become the place where the extended family knows they can always find a bed when they come to town to visit. My main focus now though is my own family. Three kids so far and planning for a couple more. We share a large, sectioned house with two or three other families of similar financial status, sharing expenses and meals which reduces the burden considerably. The kids can always get attention or help from somewhere in the house and all the adults care for all the children as they would their own. We live far enough outside the city that we don't have to worry about letting our kids wander around the property without an adult escort. All the kids are homeschooled within the commune because... well... I've seen where the education system is going. They, of course, do get to socialise with other children in outside school events. The whole family is close and loving.


    I am emotionally healthy. I still have dramatic swings between hypercreativity and enthusiasm and mild depression but I've learned to ride the waves and to be productive in the troughs and the peaks. I have a positive outlook on life and look forward to every day. I see obstacles as challenges and opportunities and always welcome the chance to grow as a person. I meditate frequently and practice yoga for purely pragmatic reasons. I've found my meaning and direction for my life. It centers largely on giving my kids the best opportunity in life to achieve what they want. Eternal purpose is wrapped in their success and the continuation of my family line. I don't have any need to superstition or overspiritualising the world. I am happy and content in the meaning that can be found in tangible, physical reality.

    There you have it. My perfect future in ten years time. I have to admit, I found that writing task to be quite enjoyable and uplifting. I also noticed a change in my writing style about two paras in. I stopped talking about this other person and started talking about a person I could really see myself becoming someday. I was living it in my imagination. It was like I was already there. I'm feeling quite happy now. Now that I've stepped back into the present day, I can see this beautiful future ahead of me and I know that it is possible. I don't think I've overreached myself in the slightest. I know I could achieve more, but honestly, I don't think I'd want to. That life just seem idyllic to me.

    Well, I hope I've inspired some of you to have a go of this yourselves. It really is a worthwhile investment toward your own happiness.

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

  • OCD

    A little while ago I was talking to my housemate 7lifeuncommon7 about the idea of deliberately programing oneself to have OCD type tendencies toward useful activities (his post). Since I've done work in hypnosis in the past I know this to be not only possible but quite normal to the human mind. 95% of our daily actions are subconscious and habitual. If I choose to moderate my thoughts in such a way as to become uncomfortable when I am in a messy environment (particularly one under my care) and condition a stimulus-response action of cleaning when I am uncomfortable then I should be able to program a neat-freak OCD into my psyche.

    Yesterday I was a little upset (a misunderstanding with a friend and also having to deal with a university bureaucracy in the same day and none of the stores in the city having the book I wanted except borders which had it at a greatly inflated price) so I was more than a little frustrated when I got home. I was borderline psychotic. It was an ideal time to begin my experiment. I'd already programmed myself with a collapse anchor (thinking one thing triggers a set of thoughts to bring the mind to a set conclusion) regarding my anger issues so when I got home I knew automatically that I had to play loud, aggressive music before interacting with anybody. Standing in my incredibly messy, dusty and smelly room which hadn't been cleaned since 2006 I realized that I needed to do something active and that is when I remembered my experiment.

    I began cleaning. Furiously and meticulously. I was in search and destroy mode and my target was disorder. I found patches of floor I hadn't seen all year. There were papers from a seminar I attended in February and underneath them were notes from my prac last year. There was no time for reminiscing. I was engaged in avoidance behaviour and the lack of conscious thought was comparative bliss. There was dust everywhere and on everything. Rather than ignoring it as I normally do, I found that small feeling of repulsion and amplified it to an unusual level. Dust? In my room? How dare it! I had to be methodical about it though. I cannot vacuum until I've tidied absolutely EVERYTHING from the floor. The dust gathered in clusters in the corners like Jews in a Nazi invasion but I would not be intimidated. Like a gas chamber of Auschwitz I descended upon the fearful yet probably undeserving dust particles without mercy, sucking them into my vacuum cleaner of ethnic cleansing. Hmm... that metaphor was pointlessly offensive. Anyway, my room was soon sparkling and White. I even cleaned under my bed, behind the cupboards and on top of the bookshelf. When a part of me said, 'Okay, you've cleaned heaps. You can have a break now.' I ignored it and soldiered on like Germany into Russia. When I saw the state of the bathroom I promised myself 'I'll just clean up a little bit and then I'll stop.' I was soon vacuuming the whole house. After just four hours of cleaning it was already becoming a compulsion. I tried to have a break but I kept thinking about all the mess that was still in the house. I began compulsively scrubbing dishes, pots and pans which had been building up over the last few weeks. My housemates seemed either inspired or guilted into doing a little work also (Japan and Italy?). By the end of my frenzy I could barely move.

    So far my experiment appears mostly successful. Today I am not feeling overly motivated to clean everything, though I did compulsively vacuum up a pile of dust that I missed last night. This is probably a good thing considering the number of assignments I have pending. The programming seems to be primarily a stress response at this stage. Cleaning to relax: I can see that being a useful trait. I am curious to see how far I can take this self programming concept.

Jamindavey

  • Visit Jamindavey's Xanga Site
    • Name: Jamin
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 6/15/2004

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • I think too much

Recommended